On the other hand, the Pacific Lender argued that the land should be partitioned in a method that might give them a larger share of the land. The court in the long run ruled in favor of Hannah, acquiring that the Pacific Lender was not entitled to a bigger share https://title-and-ownership-lawye58133.acidblog.net/62359805/covenants-and-land-use-restrictions-wakeel-in-karachi-options